Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A quantum algorithm for learning a graph of bounded degree

Published 28 Feb 2024 in quant-ph and math.CO | (2402.18714v1)

Abstract: We are presented with a graph, $G$, on $n$ vertices with $m$ edges whose edge set is unknown. Our goal is to learn the edges of $G$ with as few queries to an oracle as possible. When we submit a set $S$ of vertices to the oracle, it tells us whether or not $S$ induces at least one edge in $G$. This so-called OR-query model has been well studied, with Angluin and Chen giving an upper bound on the number of queries needed of $O(m \log n)$ for a general graph $G$ with $m$ edges. When we allow ourselves to make quantum queries (we may query subsets in superposition), then we can achieve speedups over the best possible classical algorithms. In the case where $G$ has maximum degree $d$ and is $O(1)$-colorable, Montanaro and Shao presented an algorithm that learns the edges of $G$ in at most $\tilde{O}(d2m{3/4})$ quantum queries. This gives an upper bound of $\tilde{O}(m{3/4})$ quantum queries when $G$ is a matching or a Hamiltonian cycle, which is far away from the lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{m})$ queries given by Ambainis and Montanaro. We improve on the work of Montanaro and Shao in the case where $G$ has bounded degree. In particular, we present a randomized algorithm that, with high probability, learns cycles and matchings in $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{m})$ quantum queries, matching the theoretical lower bound up to logarithmic factors.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. Learning a hidden matching. SIAM Journal on Computing, 33(2):487–501, 2004.
  2. Efficient quantum algorithms for (gapped) group testing and junta testing. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, pages 903–922. SIAM, 2016.
  3. A. Ambainis and A. Montanaro. Quantum algorithms for search with wildcards and combinatorial group testing. Quantum Information & Computation, 14:439–453, 2014.
  4. D. Angluin and J. Chen. Learning a hidden graph using O⁢(log⁡n)𝑂𝑛O(\log n)italic_O ( roman_log italic_n ) queries per edge. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 74:546–556, 2008.
  5. Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 48(4):778–797, 2001.
  6. An optimal procedure for gap closing in whole genome shotgun sequencing. In Proceedings of the fifth annual international conference on computational biology, pages 22–30, 2001.
  7. A. Belovs. Quantum algorithms for learning symmetric juntas via adversary bound. In 2014 IEEE 29th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC), pages 22–31, 2014.
  8. Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing. SIAM journal on computing, 26(5):1510–1523, 1997.
  9. E. Bernstein and U. Vazirani. Quantum complexity theory. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, pages 11–20, 1993.
  10. Combinatorial search on graphs motivated by bioinformatics applications: A brief survey. In Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science: 31st International Workshop, WG 2005, Metz, France, June 23-25, 2005, Revised Selected Papers 31, pages 16–27. Springer, 2005.
  11. D. Du and F. K. Hwang. Combinatorial group testing and its applications, volume 12. World Scientific, 2000.
  12. Quantum query complexity of some graph problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 35(6):1310–1328, 2006.
  13. L. K. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’96, pages 212–219, 1996.
  14. S. Janson. Large deviation inequalities for sums of indicator variables. arXiv:1609.00533[math.PR], 2016.
  15. Random Graphs. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
  16. Quantum algorithms for graph problems with cut queries. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 939–958. SIAM, 2021.
  17. A. Montanaro and C. Shao. Quantum algorithms for learning a hidden graph and beyond. arXiv:2011.08611v2 [quant-ph], 2021.
  18. V. G. Vizing. On an estimate of the chromatic class of a p𝑝pitalic_p-graph. Diskret. Analiz., pages 25–30, 1964.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.