Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Training Classical Neural Networks by Quantum Machine Learning

Published 26 Feb 2024 in quant-ph | (2402.16465v1)

Abstract: In recent years, advanced deep neural networks have required a large number of parameters for training. Therefore, finding a method to reduce the number of parameters has become crucial for achieving efficient training. This work proposes a training scheme for classical neural networks (NNs) that utilizes the exponentially large Hilbert space of a quantum system. By mapping a classical NN with $M$ parameters to a quantum neural network (QNN) with $O(\text{polylog} (M))$ rotational gate angles, we can significantly reduce the number of parameters. These gate angles can be updated to train the classical NN. Unlike existing quantum machine learning (QML) methods, the results obtained from quantum computers using our approach can be directly used on classical computers. Numerical results on the MNIST and Iris datasets are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Additionally, we investigate the effects of deeper QNNs and the number of measurement shots for the QNN, followed by the theoretical perspective of the proposed method. This work opens a new branch of QML and offers a practical tool that can greatly enhance the influence of QML, as the trained QML results can benefit classical computing in our daily lives.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, An introduction to quantum machine learning, Contemporary Physics 56, 172 (2015).
  2. E. Farhi and H. Neven, Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors (2018), arXiv:1802.06002 [quant-ph] .
  3. M. Schuld and N. Killoran, Quantum machine learning in feature hilbert spaces, Physical Review Letters 122, 10.1103/physrevlett.122.040504 (2019).
  4. I. Kerenidis and A. Prakash, Quantum recommendation systems (2016), arXiv:1603.08675 .
  5. R. Nembrini, M. Ferrari Dacrema, and P. Cremonesi, Feature selection for recommender systems with quantum computing, Entropy 23, 10.3390/e23080970 (2021).
  6. P.-L. Dallaire-Demers and N. Killoran, Quantum generative adversarial networks, Phys. Rev. A 98, 012324 (2018).
  7. S. Lloyd and C. Weedbrook, Quantum generative adversarial learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 040502 (2018).
  8. Y. Du, M.-H. Hsieh, and D. Tao, Efficient online quantum generative adversarial learning algorithms with applications (2019), arXiv:1904.09602 .
  9. M. Soltanolkotabi, A. Javanmard, and J. D. Lee, Theoretical insights into the optimization landscape of over-parameterized shallow neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 65, 742 (2019).
  10. C.-Y. Liu, C.-H. A. Lin, and K.-C. Chen, Learning quantum phase estimation by variational quantum circuits (2023), arXiv:2311.04690 [quant-ph] .
  11. L. S. de Souza, J. H. A. de Carvalho, and T. A. E. Ferreira, Classical artificial neural network training using quantum walks as a search procedure, IEEE Transactions on Computers 71, 378 (2022).
  12. Qiskit circuit library, https://qiskit.org/documentation/stubs/qiskit.circuit.library.EfficientSU2.html (2023).
  13. I. J. Good, Rational decisions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 14, 107 (1952), https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1952.tb00104.x .
  14. IBM Quantum, https://quantum-computing.ibm.com (n.d.).
  15. L. Deng, The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 29, 141 (2012).
  16. R. A. FISHER, The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Annals of Eugenics 7, 179 (1936), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x .
  17. S. Aaronson and L. Chen, Complexity-theoretic foundations of quantum supremacy experiments, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.05903  (2016).
  18. S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov, The computational complexity of linear optics, in Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (2011) pp. 333–342.
  19. S. Montangero, E. Montangero, and Evenson, Introduction to tensor network methods (Springer, 2018).
  20. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor network states and geometry, Journal of Statistical Physics 145, 891 (2011).
Citations (13)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.