Weak Ergodicity Breaking in Optical Sensing
Abstract: The time-integrated intensity transmitted by a laser driven resonator obeys L\'evy's arcsine laws [Ramesh \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textit{in press} (2024)]. Here we demonstrate the implications of these laws for optical sensing. We consider the standard goal of resonant optical sensors, namely to report a perturbation to their resonance frequency. In this context, we quantify the sensing precision attained using a finite energy budget combined with time or ensemble averaging of the time-integrated intensity. We find that ensemble averaging outperforms time averaging for short measurement times, but the advantage disappears as the measurement time increases. We explain this behavior in terms of weak ergodicity breaking, arising when the time for the time-integrated intensity to explore the entire phase space diverges but the measurement time remains finite. Evidence that the former time diverges is presented in first passage and return time distributions. Our results are relevant to all types of sensors, in optics and beyond, where stochastic time-integrated fields or intensities are measured to detect an event. In particular, choosing the right averaging strategy can improve sensing precision by orders of magnitude with zero energy cost.
- F. Vollmer and S. Arnold, Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: label-free detection down to single molecules, Nat. Methods 5, 591 (2008).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
- J. L. Lebowitz and O. Penrose, Modern ergodic theory, Phys. Today 26, 23 (1973).
- J. P. Bouchaud, Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems, J. phys., I 2, 1705 (1992).
- L. F. Cugliandolo and J. Kurchan, Weak ergodicity breaking in mean-field spin-glass models, Philos. mag., B 71, 501 (1995).
- G. Folena and F. Zamponi, On weak ergodicity breaking in mean-field spin glasses, SciPost Phys. 15, 109 (2023).
- A. Russomanno, M. Fava, and R. Fazio, Weak ergodicity breaking in josephson-junction arrays, Phys. Rev. B 106, 035123 (2022).
- F. M. Surace, G. Giudici, and M. Dalmonte, Weak-ergodicity-breaking via lattice supersymmetry, Quantum 4, 339 (2020).
- M. Schecter and T. Iadecola, Weak ergodicity breaking and quantum many-body scars in spin-1 xy𝑥𝑦xyitalic_x italic_y magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 147201 (2019).
- M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papić, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nat. Phys. 17, 675 (2021).
- M. A. Lomholt, I. M. Zaid, and R. Metzler, Subdiffusion and weak ergodicity breaking in the presence of a reactive boundary, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 200603 (2007).
- P. Singh, Extreme value statistics and arcsine laws for heterogeneous diffusion processes, Phys. Rev. E 105, 024113 (2022).
- A. G. Cherstvy and R. Metzler, Ergodicity breaking and particle spreading in noisy heterogeneous diffusion processes, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 144105 (2015).
- G. Margolin and E. Barkai, Nonergodicity of blinking nanocrystals and other lévy-walk processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 080601 (2005).
- V. G. Ramesh, K. J. H. Peters, and S. Rodriguez, Arcsine laws of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. in press (2024).
- G. Bel and E. Barkai, Random walk to a nonergodic equilibrium concept, Phys. Rev. E 73, 016125 (2006).
- A. Rebenshtok and E. Barkai, Weakly non-ergodic statistical physics, J. Stat. Phys 133, 565 (2008).
- N. Korabel and E. Barkai, Distributions of time averages for weakly chaotic systems: The role of infinite invariant density, Phys. Rev. E 88, 032114 (2013).
- G. Pitruzzello and T. F. Krauss, Photonic crystal resonances for sensing and imaging, J Opt. 20, 073004 (2018).
- P. Lévy, Sur certains processus stochastiques homogènes, Compos. Math. 7, 283 (1940).
- S. N. Majumdar, A. Pal, and G. Schehr, Extreme value statistics of correlated random variables: A pedagogical review, Phys. Rep. 840, 1 (2020).
- S. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection theory, Prentice Hall Signal Processing Series (Prentice-Hall PTR, Hoboken, 1998).
- W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications No. Vols. 1 and 2 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1957).
- R. Bhattacharya and E. Waymire, Stochastic Processes with Applications, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics - Applied Probability and Statistics Section (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990).
- M. Ding and W. Yang, Distribution of the first return time in fractional brownian motion and its application to the study of on-off intermittency, Phys. Rev. E 52, 207 (1995).
- A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299 (2009).
- W. Langbein, No exceptional precision of exceptional-point sensors, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023805 (2018).
- H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing, Nat. Commun. 9, 1 (2018).
- J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photon. Res. 8, 1457 (2020).
- R. Duggan, S. A. Mann, and A. Alù, Limitations of sensing at an exceptional point, ACS Photonics 9, 1554 (2022).
- O. Kyriienko, H. Sigurdsson, and T. C. H. Liew, Probabilistic solving of NP𝑁𝑃{NP}italic_N italic_P-hard problems with bistable nonlinear optical networks, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195301 (2019).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
