Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Cross-border Exchange of CBDCs using Layer-2 Blockchain

Published 22 Dec 2023 in cs.CR and cs.SI | (2312.16193v2)

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel multi-layer blockchain architecture for the cross-border trading of CBDCs. The permissioned layer-2, by relying on the public consensus of the underlying network, assures the security and integrity of the transactions and ensures interoperability with domestic CBDCs implementations. Multiple Layer-3s operate various Automated Market Makers (AMMs) and compete with each other for the lowest costs. To provide insights into the practical implications of the system, simulations of trading costs are conducted based on historical FX rates, with Project Mariana as a benchmark. The study shows that, even with liquidity fragmentation, a multi-layer and multi-AMM setup is more cost-efficient than a single AMM.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Nakamoto, S. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” URL www.bitcoin.org.
  2. Buterin, V. “Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform.” .
  3. Werner, S. M., Perez, D., Gudgeon, L., Klages-Mundt, A., Harz, D., Knottenbelt, W. J. “SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi).” (2022) 2101.08778.
  4. Schär, F. “Decentralized Finance: On Blockchain- and Smart Contract-based Financial Markets.” (2020) URL https://ssrn.com/abstract=3571335orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3571335.
  5. Auer, R., Haslhofer, B., Kitzler, S., Saggese, P., Victor, F. “The Technology of Decentralized Finance (DeFi).” (2023).
  6. Gogol, K., Killer, C., Schlosser, M., Boeck, T., Stiller, B. “SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) - Fundamentals, Taxonomy and Risks.” IEEE Computer Society (2023) .
  7. Ward, O., Rochemont, S. “Understanding central bank digital currencies (CBDC).” Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1–52.
  8. “Cross-border exchange of wholesale CBDCs using automated market-makers.” (2023).
  9. Náñez Alonso, S. L., Jorge-Vazquez, J., Reier Forradellas, R. F. “Central Banks Digital Currency: Detection of Optimal Countries for the Implementation of a CBDC and the Implication for Payment Industry Open Innovation.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7.1 10.3390/joitmc7010072 URL https://www.mdpi.com/2199-8531/7/1/72.
  10. Chu, Y., Lee, J., Kim, S., Kim, H., Yoon, Y., Chung, H. “Review of Offline Payment Function of CBDC Considering Security Requirements.” Applied Sciences 12.9 10.3390/app12094488 URL https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/9/4488.
  11. Chaum, D., Grothoff, C., Moser, T. “How to Issue a Central Bank Digital Currency.” (2021) 2103.00254.
  12. “Drex – Digital Brazilian Real.” (2023) URL https://www.bcb.gov.br/en/financialstability/drex_en.
  13. Sguanci, C., Spatafora, R., Vergani, A. M. “Layer 2 blockchain scaling: A survey.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.10881 .
  14. Yee, B., Song, D., McCorry, P., Buckland, C. “Shades of Finality and Layer 2 Scaling.” (2022) 2201.07920.
  15. Gangwal, A., Gangavalli, H. R., Thirupathi, A. “A Survey of Layer-Two Blockchain Protocols.” (2022) 2204.08032.
  16. “DeFi Llama.” (2022) URL https://defillama.com/.
  17. Morales-Resendiz, R., et al. “Implementing a retail CBDC: Lessons learned and key insights.” Latin American Journal of Central Banking 2.1 100022 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.latcb.2021.100022 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143821000028.
  18. Lipton, A., Sepp, A. “Automated Market-Making for Fiat Currencies.” (2021) 2109.12196.
  19. Gogol, K. “Github Repository, CBDCs in AMMs.” (2023) URL https://github.com/kgogol/CBDCinAMMs.
  20. Rajput, V. U. “Research on know your customer (KYC).” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 3.7 541–546 (2013).
  21. Fiege, U., Fiat, A., Shamir, A. “Zero knowledge proofs of identity.” In Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing 210–217 (1987) .
  22. Buterin, V., Illum, J., Nadler, M., Schär, F., Soleimani, A. “Blockchain privacy and regulatory compliance: Towards a practical equilibrium.” Available at SSRN .
  23. Xu, J., Paruch, K., Cousaert, S., Feng, Y. “SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols.” ACM Computing Surveys 55.11 1–50 (2023) 10.1145/3570639 URL https://doi.org/10.1145%2F3570639.
  24. Gudgeon, L., Werner, S. M., Perez, D., Knottenbelt, W. J. “DeFi Protocols for Loanable Funds: Interest Rates, Liquidity and Market Efficiency.” (2020) 2006.13922.
  25. Egorov, M. “Curve Whitepaper: Automatic market-making with dynamic peg.” .
  26. Adams, H., Zinsmeister, N., Salem moody, M., River Keefer, u., Robinson, D. “Uniswap v3 Core.” .
  27. Xu, J., Paruch, K., Cousaert, S., Feng, Y. “SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols.” URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12732.
  28. Tiruviluamala, N., Port, A., Lewis, E. “A General Framework for Impermanent Loss in Automated Market Makers.” (2022) 2203.11352.
  29. “Etherscan.” (2023) URL https://etherscan.io/.
  30. “zkSync.” (2022) URL https://zksync.io/.
  31. “starknet.” (2022) URL https://starkware.co/starknet/.
  32. “Polygon.” (2023) URL https://polygon.technology/.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel multi-layer architecture integrating Layer-2 rollups with multiple Layer-3 DEXes for cost-efficient CBDC transactions.
  • The simulation using historical FX data demonstrates that the L2-L3 setup significantly reduces trade costs compared to single-AMM systems.
  • The framework ensures transaction privacy and regulatory compliance by employing permissioned networks with rule-based routing for optimal fee selection.

Cross-Border Exchange of CBDCs Using Layer-2 Blockchain

This paper introduces an innovative approach for cross-border trading of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) through a multi-layer blockchain architecture. Specifically, the authors propose a permissioned Layer-2 (L2) blockchain that leverages the public consensus of an underlying network to ensure secure and interoperable CBDC transactions. This framework is further expanded by incorporating multiple Layer-3 (L3) blockchains, each hosting its own decentralized exchanges (DEXes) with different Automated Market Maker (AMM) configurations, which compete for cost-effectiveness.

Methodological Insights

The proposed system architecture involves a non-custodial Layer-2 rollup on a public Layer-1 blockchain that integrates Layer-3 blockchains. These L3s operate decentralized exchanges or other decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols utilizing CBDCs. The system is designed for dynamic cost optimization; it automatically selects the L3 and AMM-DEX offering the optimal transaction costs at any given time. It also supports transaction privacy and compliance with regulatory standards through the use of permissioned networks requiring participants to undergo KYC procedures.

A rule-based router is introduced to analyze trade costs and direct transactions toward L3 operators with the minimum fees, an approach that combines the strengths of both private and public blockchains. This is compared with Project Mariana's L1-based AMM framework, which the authors argue is less cost-efficient due to the single-operator setup.

Simulation and Results

The authors utilize historical foreign exchange (FX) data to simulate the cost efficiency of their proposed architecture compared to Project Mariana. The analysis includes factors such as gas fees, liquidity pool (LP) swap fees, and price impact, revealing that L2-L3 networks significantly reduce trade costs, especially under high-gas conditions.

Notably, the L2-L3 Exchange setup outperforms conventional single-AMM systems like Project Mariana in both small and large transactions, exhibiting enhanced resilience to liquidity fragmentation across multiple L3s. The simulation demonstrates competitive performance under varying market conditions, suggesting a robust capability for handling diverse transaction volumes while minimizing costs.

Contributions and Implications

This work makes several contributions to the field of decentralized finance and CBDC implementation. It demonstrates that a multi-AMM system on L2 can be more cost-effective than a single-AMM approach with fragmented liquidity. The study provides a detailed cost analysis for CBDC swaps on different AMM configurations and presents a quantitative framework for evaluating cross-border CBDC efficiency on DEXes.

Additionally, the authors offer a comprehensive simulation framework based on historical FX data, which can be adapted for future cross-border CBDC projects or private DeFi ecosystems. This work points toward a future where Layer-2 and Layer-3 architectures could play a significant role in the scalability and cost-efficiency of decentralized financial systems involving CBDCs.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a sophisticated multi-layer blockchain architecture for cross-border CBDC exchanges, demonstrating through rigorous simulation analysis that such a system can achieve superior cost-efficiency. The approach provides a promising path for developing scalable, secure, and cost-effective decentralized financial infrastructures, aligning with the evolving landscape of digital currencies and DeFi protocols. Future work could further explore optimization strategies for AMM selections and the integration of additional DeFi services within this layered framework.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 4 tweets with 119 likes about this paper.