General failure of Rieffel’s Condition 1.5 for reduced groupoid C*-algebras

Determine whether Rieffel’s Condition 1.5 inequality from Rieffel (1998, “Metrics on state spaces from actions of compact groups”) holds for reduced groupoid C*-algebras C_r^*(𝔾) when 𝔾 is an étale transformation groupoid, and specifically prove that this inequality fails in general even for transformation groupoids. The purpose is to clarify whether the key inequality needed to transfer estimates from function spaces back to the C*-algebra—used in establishing necessity of total boundedness conditions for metrization of weak*-topology on state space fibres—can be expected to hold in the groupoid setting.

Background

The paper constructs Lipschitz quasi-seminorms L_ℓk on reduced groupoid C*-algebras C_r*(𝔾) arising from continuous length functions on étale groupoids and studies the induced pseudo-metrics on the state space. Because ker(L_ℓk) contains C(X) for transformation groupoids 𝔾 = Γ ⋉ X, the metric on the entire state space is a pseudo-metric and one must restrict attention to fibres S_η determined by probability measures η on X.

For transformation groupoids with a continuous, proper length function having rapid decay, the authors show each fibre (S_η, ρ{Lk}) has uniformly bounded diameter, and when X is finite, ρ{Lk} metrizes the weak*-topology, yielding a quasi-compact quantum metric space. However, establishing necessity of the total boundedness condition (used to show metrization) typically requires an inequality like Rieffel’s Condition 1.5 to pass from function-space estimates to the C*-algebra setting. The authors conjecture that this inequality fails in general for reduced groupoid C*-algebras, even for transformation groupoids, leaving open the precise status of that inequality in the groupoid context.

References

We conjecture that in general for $C{\ast}_{r}(\mathcal G)$ even when $\mathcal G$ is some transformation groupoid, the inequality mentioned in Condition 1.5 fails.

Metrics on $C^{\ast}$-algebras of Étale groupoids from length functions  (2504.13530 - Chattopadhyay et al., 18 Apr 2025) in Remark following Corollary 20, Main results section